Sunday, October 05, 2008

Book Groups, Real and In Film

I haven't said much about my book group, BOOKLEAVES lately. A couple of meetings ago, we ate Indian food in Bundang and discussed Persuasion then traipsed over to Mitzi's apartment to watch The Jane Austen Book Club and scarf down freshly-baked chocolate cookies and pumpkin empanadas.

For the following meeting, we read A Spectacle Of Corruption and met at a nice Italian restaurant in Gangnam called Mad For Garlic. The place is not misnamed; I thought I'd walked past the place, then my nose gave me the delightful information that I was on the right track. Wonderful food -- I could have eaten my way through the whole menu without pause. The lower-level location and the dark wood paneling seemed to recall Benjamin Weaver's clandestine meetings in disguise in out-of-the-way taverns and coffeehouses around London. Even better than the food was when Veronica showed up with 50+ books that she wanted to loan, swap or give away. Visit Amber's blog to see a picture of my haul (the rest of the Green Gables series!) and me, looking every inch the bibliomaniac that I am.

Next week, on October 12, we're meeting at our usual bright and friendly coffee shop to discuss The Road. It doesn't quite match the bleakness of the novel's setting. Maybe the weather will be gloomy and we could walk around the city and speak to each other in sentence fragments without much punctuation! Or not.

The beauty part of meeting at the usual coffee shop (which is called Angel-In-Us -- isn't that disgustingly cutesy?) is that Kyobo bookstore is one floor down, and that's where we usually conclude our meeting. It's a nice way to wrap up. I'll need to go down there anyway to grab a copy of the following meeting's book, Stumbling On Happiness by Daniel Gilbert. This is the first time we will have read any pop psychology in book group, and I'm eager to see how it goes.

As you can see, my book group is wonderful. Not only are all the members double-cool, but the group itself is intelligently done. For example, new members are encouraged to suggest books, and ideas for changing things up and keeping it fresh are always given consideration. Although members have come and gone, BOOKLEAVES remains vital and seems like something that could go on forever.

All of this is why The Jane Austen Book Club annoyed me so much. At the time, I enjoyed watching it because Amy, Amber and Rebecca kept up a steady stream of delightful snark throughout the whole picture, and of course, there were those cookies and empanadas. Afterwards though, the movie stayed with me in an unpleasant way, like a stubborn popcorn kernel lodged between the teeth and gums.

What about this movie bugged me so much? Yeah, it was a book group. Yeah, it was Jane Austen. So far, so good. But as conceived by the older woman in the group (I can't think of her name, but the actress was Lynn Redgrave), the group was only meant to have six members and only meant to meet for six months. After that, Game Over. And no one objected! No one said: Yo, What if we want to keep meeting and reading? What are we -- just a damn diversion for you while you grow your hair out and work on meeting husband #7? Begone, Dilettante!

And limiting the group to 6 members, with the one token guy? Please. What if a really cool bookwormish type like one of us had moved to the area and became friends with one of the characters? Sorry, we can't invite you to our club because Austen only wrote six novels. Aaargh, excuse me while I gnash my teeth and possibly vomit. It wasn't a book club; it was an effing sorority. I refuse to believe that any group could be that shallow. I've heard of groups that have had a Jane Austen phase, but they stayed together and had a George Eliot phase, a Charles Dickens phase and so on. The Jane Austen Book Club sounds smart, especially when they're discussing the novels, but ultimately, it's someone's dumb idea of what book clubs actually are about.

12 comments:

Susan said...

I saw that movie! And what bothered me is how all the crises of consciousness were solved so easily with no repercussions! The pretentious girl doesn't have her affair and rekindles her marriage; the bitter divorcee gets the cute guy in the end; etc, etc. It could have been a Jane Austen movie if they had taken words from the books and applied them to their lives - or the ideas in the books - I think the movie was supposed to be about that, but it didn't work. I wanted to see more Jane Austen in their lives! And it's too bad. Plus, you're right, they only met For Austen, and they could have then branched out. You and I know the world is full of books, obviously the movie makers don't!!! Your real book club sounds much more fun and interesting anyway.

beth♥ said...

Bravo! I had the same feelings regarding said film.

jenclair said...

I get a kick out of the activities of your book club. I think I'd love Mad For Garlic...nice that the restaurant had great food and in some ways connected to the book!

myza said...

Hi! I used to be part of the Bookleaves book club few years ago and I totally miss it! I found your blog from Veronica. I am living in Turkey now and there is no book club so I might have to start one!!

Bookfool said...

I have a copy of Stumbling . . . uh, what was that title. Stumbling on Happiness? Into Happiness? Anyway, I have a copy and I sat right down to read, the moment I came home with it. I didn't get far. It's sitting on a shelf, looking bored and unhappy.

Bybee said...

Susan,
You and I should do tag-team movie reviews. "Susan & Susan Sound Off"

Beth,
Someone that used to be in book club said that the movie made him want to gouge his eyes out.

Jenclair,
Mad For Garlic is great...I hope we meet there again. The smells coming from the place are wonderful. Our leader, Veronica picked it, and she did a great job.


Myza,
Hi! I recognize your name from the BOOKLEAVES page on Facebook. Are you teaching in Turkey?

Bookfool,
Hmmm...that doesn't sound like a promising beginning. I'll let you know how my foray into it goes.

Bybee said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Care said...

I am SO with you on that comment about "what if a new bookish person moves to town?" I've tried to get myself invited into a book club and ... WAIT! maybe they just don't like me. Anyway.

Loved your paragraph on The Road. too funny.

Dewey said...

I didn't see the movie, but I hated the book. It really stereotyped gender in a way unflattering to both genders. It was also, as you say, shallow.

Katya said...

I didn't care for the movie or the book for most of the reasons mentioned here.

I love your book club, though. It always seems to be interesting.

Tara said...

Your book club sounds fabulous! I'd totally love to go to Mad for Garlic. I regret not eating at The Stinking Rose the time I was in San Francisco. Sorry you didn't enjoy the film...I did but I think I was pleasantly surprised and I didn't read too much into it. But I can completely see your views.

Carrie K said...

If only you could have put your finger on what annoyed you about the Jane Austen Book Club, Bybee. ;)